Showing posts with label Trademark Infringement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trademark Infringement. Show all posts
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Friday, April 17, 2009
The Dumbest Trademark Demand Letter?
Marc Randazza points to one of the dumbest trademark demand letters he's ever read: dumb not because it has "the misplaced certitude, the overblown rhetoric, the baseless imputation of evil to the recipient, and over-all lack of self-awareness" that Marty Schwimmer would consider denoting a truly dumb demand letter (BTW: great wording, Marty!); but rather because it asserted a ridiculous claim, which led to the filing of declaratory judgment action.
Overzealous lawyer, or over-reaching client?
UPDATE: Ron Coleman adds "When will they ever learn?" Exactly.
Overzealous lawyer, or over-reaching client?
UPDATE: Ron Coleman adds "When will they ever learn?" Exactly.
Labels:
Lawsuit,
Lawyers,
Trademark Infringement
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Oh this is rich....
Martin Schwimmer at The Trademark Blog reports that CitiGroup, fresh on the heels of their $45 Billion federal bailout last year, has sued a Brooklyn pawn shop which had been using the name ALL CITI PAWN. (Martin has posted a copy of the Complaint on his blog and here.)
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Settling a Trademark Dispute by Kicking the Lawyers Out
Ryan Gile (aka the Las Vegas Trademark Attorney), reports that the Monster Cable vs. Monster Mini Golf trademark dispute has apparently settled.
Best takeaway is in the comment posted by Monster Mini Golf:
Best takeaway is in the comment posted by Monster Mini Golf:
"The turning point came when we were on a conference call with Noel and Kevin Lee, and lawyers from both sides, and we were getting absolutely nowhere with lawyers governing every move. About an hour into it, it got so annoying, that someone suggested kicking all the lawyers out, and we all agreed to give that a try. From there, the conversation flowed pretty smoothly, and we were able to speak freely and frankly with Noel and Kevin, and both sides got an understanding of each other's positions."When are we lawyers going to realize that it's not all about us?
Labels:
Lawsuit,
Lawyers,
Trademark Infringement
Friday, January 30, 2009
American Idol comes to Austin (or at least their attorneys do)
FremantleMedia, owner of the TV show American Idol, has sued Austin's Palazio Men's Club, for their use of "Stripper Idol." A copy of the complaint can be found here.
The various media reports all seem to focus on the issue of likelihood of confusion (which doesn't strike me as very strong), yet ignoring the dilution by tarnishment claim (which seems like a slam dunk).
The various media reports all seem to focus on the issue of likelihood of confusion (which doesn't strike me as very strong), yet ignoring the dilution by tarnishment claim (which seems like a slam dunk).
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Project Runway judge Michael Kors sued for infringement
The LA Times is reporting that designer Michael Kors has been sued for trademark infringement by the estate of artist/designer Tony Duquette.
As Project Runway Season 4 winner Christian might say, "Fierce!"
As Project Runway Season 4 winner Christian might say, "Fierce!"
THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR trademark dispute
THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR CLOTHING COMPANY (Woolrich, Inc.) is suing THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR OUTFITTER (Eddie Bauer, Inc.). The Seattle Trademark Lawyer has the Complaint.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
He Can't Drive 55....
But Sammy Hagar knows the Lanham Act. Sammy Hagar's licensing company is suing over a Cabo Wabo Cantina restaurant franchise in Fresno California. Check out the Las Vegas Trademark Attorney's post. (hat tip to Tamera Bennett).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)